Every conceivable observation can be fitted into it . They have become part of an evolutionary dogma accepted by most of us as part of our training." L. These massive stars radiate energy very rapidly some as much as 100,000 to 1 million times more rapidly than our own sun. one which cannot be refuted by any possible observations. Ideas, either without basis or based on a few laboratory experiments carried out in extremely simplified systems, have attained currency far beyond their validity. Science tells us otherwise their initial larger mass would have been impossibly large.
For starters there is no agreement on what should be the world’s population and is also clear that currently the world is able to withstand the seven billion people who live and there is little doubt that it can support more, as the number increases constantly.
However, there is concern for decades that in a finite world at some point should be the limits of the world’s population, and that may not be very smart to reach those limits.
This post was translated from the Spanish by computer and may therefore contain some grammatical errors.
The question of whether or not overpopulation in the world is clearly debatable.
"I argue that the theory of evolution' does not take predictions, so far as ecology is concerned, but is instead a logical formula which can be used only to classify empiricisms [theories] and to show the relationships which such a classification implies . these theories are actually tautologies and, as such, cannot make empirically testable predictions. Evidence indicates that each of these giant packs of stars is moving in a certain direction.